02.12.2007
Whisher gives you the chance to be part of a community offering free WiFi services. Launched last month at Demo 2007, its main competitor is FON, and in fact, founder Ferran Moreno was part of FON until he left just before the official launch.
Where FON offers you the chance to share your WiFi with their own tweaked up router (Fonera), Whisher gives you the ability to use your current WiFi connection/ router by just installing their software application. With the Whisher software, you will have full control over your settings and it’ll even leave your current router settings alone. WiFi owners will have the ability to manage and see who is connected at any time with the ability to switch to a private mode (basically disabling the system) and to create a closed group of communities e.g. groups relating to friends and family. While on the same network, you chat locally or easily mark the files you want to share and initiate peer to peer transfers without any size limits.
I am personally not a big fan of sharing my WiFi network (that I pay monthly for) and I can’t see how it would market itself outside of residential areas. A large proportion of common public places have already been catered for by hotel and restaurant hotspots e.g. Starbucks, McDonalds etc. Yes some of them use T-mobile, AT&T or other networks and charge for them but I can’t see where Whisher can target it in cities or public establishments around these areas and whether those around them would even bother. My point is that most public places who would want to offer WiFi, would probably want to profit from it as well — therefore jumping on the established T-mobile and other big networks that may offer you a piece of the revenue. I can’t see many public places offering free WiFi (not yet anyway and not without a catch). It may be different in Europe or Asia and I can’t speak for them there although it would be interesting to see what the percentage of residential vs. public establishments have signed up for this.
I noticed one thing when I was browsing their site, security was not mentioned (or mentioned very obscurely). I do strongly suggest that they talk more about it as it does factor into how many will sign up for it. With security fraud and identity theft being a commonplace nowadays, it would comfort people to know that there is some sort of security mechanism in place (and how good it is).
The big question is … how reliable would the WiFi network be? I am a firm believer of “you get what you pay for”, and since you’ll be getting WiFi for free, the WiFi owner is in no obligation to give you support, nor a stable and secure network. With that, it would probably cut most of the business users out of the equation. Bandwidth or data quality may be an issue e.g. in a case where I would want to use VoIP while the owner or some other person using the network is currently downloading multiple files resulting in a poor connection.
As of date, there are 80 users within the USA, 10 in the United Kingdom and more worldwide. Although it does not take my fancy, it may still be useful for some. Other alternatives include Google Wifi, T-Mobile, AT&T and Boingo.
Product Page [Whisher]
3 Responses to: Whisher: A New WiFi Sharing Community
Ferran
February 13th, 2007 at 3:26 pm
1Hi there,
First of all thanks for commenting on Whisher.
Just to clarify, Whisher works on top of any Wi-Fi network. Instant presence information about other users connected around, integrated IM, file exchange and local services will be available both on free and paid hotspots.
From what I can see you are not a potential Whisher user, because you don’t believe in sharing at all (and this applies to all aspects in your life: connection, experiences, etc.) and your concerns about security and very high, which is completely respectable. Actually if I were you I wouldn’t use WiFi at all, even if you are at your home in your isolated protected cloud, others could easily get in and do very bad stuff. That’s why we explicitly warn users in our FAQ about the risks involved in connecting to Wi-Fi networks.
I hope this helps to make Whisher a bit more understandable.
Regards,
Mark Johnson
February 13th, 2007 at 4:21 pm
2Hi Ferran,
Thanks for taking the time to comment on Techzoogle. While I do not doubt that WiFi networks are vulnerable (actually every network is)… what I am saying is that the risks of allowing a network to be shared goes way up. Without your website talking more about how it is secured on top of that, it just makes me doubt that security has not been thought of in this case.
If for example, I secured my WiFi network with WPA or WEP and a firewall, how does the Whisher software go around that to give the user access automatically without contacting the owner itself? OR does Whisher have some sort of security mechanism in place that is not at all mentioned. Does the software create some sort of tunnel to all shared connections? is there some sort of authentication? if I used mac authentication on my WiFi network, how will Wisher go about giving access to a user that is not on the MAC list? etc. These are the questions that really need to be addressed and explained on your website.
You are right, I am not one to share my WiFi network BUT for someone that does share their WiFi network, I hate to see them have extra security vulnerabilities from the use of the Whisher software (that they don’t know about), especially if you are sharing it with everyone and anyone. You may have already addressed this but it has yet to be talked about on your website.
Mark
Ferran
February 14th, 2007 at 4:46 pm
3Hi Mark,
Once you register/share your WiFi you don’t need to leave your computer on all the time, therefore the Whisher service doesn’t change whether you (WiFi owner) have a firewall or not.
The sharing mechanism is a lot more simple than all of the methods you’ve listed. We simply gather WiFi credentials (MACs&Encryption key) and distribute them transparently through the application just to the authorized users. These credentials will never be seen in clear by anyone, they are always transported and stored encrypted.
On the other side you’re probably right in that we could better communicate these points. We will for sure take into account and take the opportunity to thank you for the input.
Regards,
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Submissions
Do you have a hot tip or news?Contact us here ...
Rss
Categories
Subscribe
Widget
Recent Readers
Sponsors
Latest News
Recently Written
Featured Posts
Recent Comments
Stan, melika
Ben, Mike, Ron
Julio
Muhammad Aminu
kraloyun, Laane
© Copyright Techzoogle. All content on this site is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.